August 1997 · National edition

The Nation

Redistricting: The Bipartisan Habit Of Selective Memory

A The Nation desk reading of redistricting, filed 1997-08.

From the file. Written for the paper dated August 1997. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As the political landscape in America continues to shift and evolve, the practice of redistricting has emerged as a contentious issue. It serves as a reminder of the bipartisan habit of selective memory that both parties exhibit when it comes to drawing the lines that define our electoral map.

Sen. Bob Dole (R-KS) on a balcony outside his Minority Leader's office at the U.S. Capitol
Sen. Bob Dole (R-KS) on a balcony outside his Minority Leader's office at the U.S. Capitol. Photo: Michael Geissinger via Wikimedia Commons

The Art of Redistricting

Redistricting, the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral districts, is a task that occurs every ten years following the national census. This vital exercise can significantly impact the balance of power in Congress and state legislatures. However, the motives behind redistricting often raise questions about fairness and representation.

Currently, as we approach the end of the decade, both Democrats and Republicans are gearing up for what promises to be a contentious and strategic redistricting cycle. The stakes are high, and the potential for manipulation is evident. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have been known to engage in gerrymandering, a practice that involves drawing districts in a way that gives one party an advantage over another.

A letter addressed to Mary Koss written by Chairman Joe Biden regarding her testifying as an expert witness at the U.S. Senate hearings that lead to the passage
A letter addressed to Mary Koss written by Chairman Joe Biden regarding her testifying as an expert witness at the U.S. Senate hearings that lead to the passage of the Violence Against Women Act. Photo: Uaphsvp via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)
"Redistricting is not just about lines on a map - it's about power and representation."

Bipartisan Blame Game

While Democrats and Republicans are quick to point fingers at each other for gerrymandering, it is essential to recognize that both parties have engaged in this practice when it serves their interests. The Democratic Party, for instance, has crafted districts that favor their candidates in urban areas, while the Republican Party has done the same in rural regions. This cyclical nature of gerrymandering reveals a troubling trend: a blatant disregard for the true essence of democracy.

As the political environment becomes increasingly polarized, the need for fair and impartial redistricting has never been more critical. Yet, both parties seem to have selective memories when it comes to their own role in perpetuating these practices. It is not uncommon to hear Democrats decrying Republican gerrymandering while conveniently ignoring their own past transgressions, and vice versa.

The Case for Reform

The ongoing cycle of gerrymandering underscores the urgent need for reform in the redistricting process. Many experts argue for independent commissions to oversee the drawing of district lines, thereby removing the politics from the equation. Such a move could mitigate the partisan maneuvering that has become the norm.

Several states have already taken steps in this direction, establishing commissions that aim to create fairer districts based on population rather than political affiliation. These efforts represent a positive shift towards ensuring that electoral maps reflect the will of the people rather than the will of the party in power.

"Reform is essential if we are to restore faith in our democratic processes."

Public Awareness and Engagement

In our rapidly changing political climate, public awareness and engagement are critical components in advocating for redistricting reform. Voter education campaigns can empower citizens to understand the implications of gerrymandering and the importance of fair representation. As the electorate becomes more informed, there is hope that the pressure will mount on lawmakers to prioritize the interests of their constituents over party loyalty.

Moreover, grassroots movements can play a pivotal role in promoting change. Organizations dedicated to electoral fairness are mobilizing citizens to demand transparency and accountability in the redistricting process. This type of citizen activism is essential in holding politicians accountable and ensuring that democracy is not sacrificed at the altar of partisan advantage.

A Call to Action

As we stand at the brink of a new redistricting cycle, it is imperative for both parties to acknowledge their role in the ongoing issue of gerrymandering. The habitual practice of selective memory must come to an end if we are to restore faith in our electoral system. It is time for Democrats and Republicans alike to commit to a fair and impartial redistricting process that truly reflects the diversity of the American electorate.

In the wake of this pivotal moment, let us call on our leaders to embrace reform, prioritize the voices of their constituents, and work toward a more equitable political landscape. The future of democracy depends on it.

✦ ✦ ✦

For local service context, see Brainrecoverycenters.