February 1994 · National edition

Opinion

Both Parties And Free Speech Without the Team Jersey

A Opinion desk reading of both parties and free speech, filed 1994-02.

From the file. Written for the paper dated February 1994. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In an era where political polarization has reached a fever pitch, both the left and right appear to be failing in their duty to uphold the cornerstone of democracy: free speech. Instead of fostering open dialogue, both parties seem more concerned with silencing dissenting voices, leading to a troubling atmosphere of censorship.

Brumfield High School, Natchez MS front elevation.
Brumfield High School, Natchez MS front elevation. Photo: Various for U.S. National Park Service via Wikimedia Commons

When Free Speech Becomes a Casualty

The current political landscape is rife with examples of how free speech is being compromised. On one side, we have the left, which has begun to adopt an increasingly intolerant stance towards ideas that diverge from its own. The rise of political correctness, while rooted in a noble desire for inclusivity, has led some to conclude that certain viewpoints must be silenced to avoid offending others. This has resulted in a chilling effect on campuses across the nation, where speakers are disinvited and debates are stifled, all in the name of protecting sensibilities.

Meanwhile, the right has not been immune to the temptation of censorship. The conservative push to regulate what can and cannot be said - especially in media and academia - has grown more pronounced. The calls for a return to traditional values often come with an undercurrent of restricting the expression of ideas that challenge their worldview. This hypocrisy is particularly evident when one considers that many of the principles the right espouses are rooted in the very freedoms they seek to limit under the guise of protecting societal norms.

Robert Heilbroner speaking at The New School in the 1990s
Robert Heilbroner speaking at The New School in the 1990s. Photo: The New School Archives via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Impact on Public Discourse

Both parties have, in their own ways, contributed to a stifling environment where public discourse is threatened. Citizens are increasingly hesitant to express their views for fear of backlash from the opposing side. This self-censorship is a quiet yet pervasive failure of oversight that undermines the very essence of democracy. If we cannot engage in open debate, we risk drifting into an echo chamber where only the loudest voices - be they left or right - are heard.

"In a democracy, the ability to express dissent is a right, not a privilege. Both parties must recognize that silencing opposing views is a slippery slope."

The ramifications of this trend are profound. The erosion of free speech not only stifles individual expression but also hampers the collective ability to address pressing social issues. When ideas are confined to partisan silos, innovative solutions and compromises become increasingly elusive. The consequence is a society less capable of tackling the complexities of our time.

A Call for Balance

It is essential that both the left and right recognize the dangers of their respective approaches to free speech. The left must acknowledge that political correctness can sometimes lead to a tyranny of the majority, where dissenting opinions are marginalized. Meanwhile, the right must confront the reality that calls for "traditional values" can morph into a form of authoritarianism that stifles the very freedoms they purport to protect.

To combat this troubling trend, we must encourage a culture of open dialogue that respects differing opinions. Both parties should strive to create environments where ideas can be debated robustly without fear of retribution. This will require a concerted effort to promote understanding and empathy, as well as a commitment to the principle that every voice matters, regardless of its alignment with the prevailing ideology.

Restoring Faith in Free Speech

Restoring faith in free speech is not merely an ideological battle; it is a necessity for the health of our democracy. Both sides must engage in introspection and recognize that the silencing of opposing views is a betrayal of the foundational principles upon which this country was built. Only by embracing the full spectrum of opinions can we hope to move forward as a unified society.

As we navigate this complex political landscape, it is crucial that we hold both parties accountable for their actions regarding free speech. The failure to do so will only serve to deepen the divides that threaten to tear our society apart. It is time for citizens to demand better - from their leaders, from one another, and from themselves. After all, a democracy thrives on the vibrant exchange of ideas, and that exchange must be protected at all costs.

✦ ✦ ✦