October 1993 · National edition

Commerce

On Housing Starts, and the bipartisan habit of selective memory

A Commerce desk reading of housing starts, filed 1993-10.

From the file. Written for the paper dated October 1993. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As new figures on housing starts hit the wire, it’s time to unpack the bipartisan habit of selective memory in the realms of housing policy and economic performance.

A MIM-104 Patriot tactical air defense missile system is towed by a heavy expanded mobility tactical truck in the National Victory Celebration parade honoring t
A MIM-104 Patriot tactical air defense missile system is towed by a heavy expanded mobility tactical truck in the National Victory Celebration parade honoring the coalition forces of Desert Storm. Photo: Michael Buchanan via Wikimedia Commons

Housing Starts: A Snapshot

The latest data from the Commerce Department indicates a modest uptick in housing starts, a key indicator of economic health. This figure is often heralded as a sign of recovery, but both sides of the aisle seem to have conveniently forgotten the broader context surrounding these numbers. While the Democrats tout this increase as a testament to their economic policies, Republicans are eager to dismiss it as a mere blip in an otherwise slow recovery.

But what both parties seem to overlook is the long-term trajectory of housing starts and the policies that have shaped them. The reality is that housing starts have fluctuated significantly over the years, influenced by a multitude of factors beyond mere party politics.

Carrollton Avenue, Mid-City New Orleans. Night shot of exterior of Angelo Brocato's some years before the Hurricane Katrina Federal Flood.
Carrollton Avenue, Mid-City New Orleans. Night shot of exterior of Angelo Brocato's some years before the Hurricane Katrina Federal Flood. Photo: Infrogmation of New Orleans via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

The Left’s Optimism

The left is quick to celebrate every uptick in housing construction as evidence of the success of the Clinton administration’s economic strategies. It is true that the administration has sought to stimulate the economy through various initiatives, particularly in housing and urban development. However, this optimism often glosses over the fact that the roots of the current situation can be traced back to policies and market conditions established long before they took office.

Moreover, the left’s narrative tends to ignore the ongoing struggles of everyday Americans. While housing starts may be increasing, the affordability crisis remains acute, with many families unable to secure loans or find homes within their budget. As the administration pats itself on the back, it risks alienating the very voters who are most affected by these economic disparities.

The Right’s Dismissal

On the other hand, the right seems intent on downplaying any positive news regarding housing starts, attributing the increase to temporary market fluctuations rather than a sign of a genuine recovery. They argue that the administration's policies are merely delaying an inevitable downturn. This perspective often disregards the complex web of factors influencing the housing market, from interest rates to demographic trends.

Furthermore, the right's narrative often simplifies the conversation to one of government intervention versus free market principles, neglecting the fact that housing is deeply intertwined with economic stability and community welfare. By dismissing the positive data entirely, they risk missing opportunities to address the underlying issues plaguing the housing market.


The Middle Ground

The truth lies somewhere in the middle. Housing starts are indeed a crucial indicator, but they are not the be-all and end-all of economic health. Both parties must take a more nuanced view that recognizes the complex realities of the housing market and the broader economy.

"Housing starts are a key indicator, but they tell only part of the story."

Policy-makers should focus on sustainable solutions that address the root causes of housing shortages and affordability issues instead of engaging in partisan cheerleading or finger-pointing. A comprehensive approach is needed - one that prioritizes long-term planning and investment in infrastructure, community development, and support for first-time homebuyers.

The Role of Government

It is critical for government at all levels to engage actively in fostering an environment conducive to growth in the housing sector. This means not only providing incentives for construction but also ensuring that regulatory frameworks do not stifle development. Striking a balance between necessary oversight and encouragement of growth is essential for a healthy housing market.

We must also remember that the housing market is not an isolated entity; it is affected by employment rates, wage growth, and broader economic trends. As such, any discussion about housing starts must incorporate a wider economic dialogue to be truly meaningful.

The discourse on housing starts needs to be reframed. Instead of treating the issue as a political football, both parties should come together to seek solutions that benefit all Americans. By engaging in constructive dialogue and moving beyond partisan narratives, we can build a housing market that is equitable, sustainable, and resilient.

✦ ✦ ✦