From the file. Written for the paper dated May 1990. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.
As we monitor the rumbling of volcanoes around the world, it is essential to scrutinize how both political parties in the United States often exhibit a selective memory regarding environmental issues, particularly those surrounding natural disasters.
Volcano Monitoring: A Scientific Necessity
As scientists keep a vigilant eye on volcano activity, the reality of their potential devastation cannot be overstated. Recent eruptions, such as those in the Philippines and the ongoing concerns surrounding Mount St. Helens, underline the need for robust monitoring systems and informed public policy. However, amid these scientific imperatives, we see a troubling trend of selective memory from both the left and the right that undermines necessary discourse and action.
The Left's Disregard for Industry Roles
On the left, there is often a fervent focus on environmental protection, yet this focus can sometimes overlook the complexities of industry’s role in natural disaster management. Environmental policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gases and promoting sustainable practices are vital, yet they must also take into account the economic ramifications on communities reliant on industries such as mining and energy production. The left’s narrative can often demonize these industries without acknowledging their potential contributions to disaster readiness and response.
The Right's Denial of Climate Change
Conversely, the right frequently downplays the seriousness of climate change and its connection to geological phenomena. In this current political climate, some leaders exhibit a tendency to dismiss scientific consensus on climate change, arguing instead for economic growth at the expense of environmental regulation. This selective amnesia regarding the scientific data surrounding natural disasters serves only to hinder our ability to prepare for and mitigate their impacts.
With the earth rumbling beneath us, both sides must confront their selective memories to advance effective policy.
A Call for Responsibility
To navigate the complexities of volcanic activity and its implications, we must move beyond partisan narratives. Our understanding of volcanoes and their effects should not be clouded by political agendas. It is time for a bipartisan approach that acknowledges the multifaceted nature of these issues, combining environmental protection with economic realities.
Lessons from the Past
The eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 provides a pertinent reminder of the devastation that can arise from volcanic activity. The federal government, under the Carter administration, was criticized for its handling of the disaster response. This event should serve as a catalyst for both parties to remember the importance of preparedness and collaboration in the face of natural disasters. However, both parties seem to forget the lessons learned, choosing instead to focus on their own narratives rather than the realities that confront us.
The Role of Science in Policy Making
Science should be at the forefront of policy discussions surrounding natural disasters. As volcanoes continue to pose threats, it is imperative that both sides of the aisle recognize the importance of scientific data in shaping effective policies. This involves listening to experts and integrating their recommendations into actionable plans.
Moving Forward Together
In the face of the unpredictable forces of nature, the American public deserves leadership that prioritizes informed decision-making over political posturing. Acknowledging the complexity of volcanic activity, as well as the interconnectedness of environmental and economic factors, should guide our approach to policy. We must advocate for a future where scientific understanding takes precedence over selective memory.
Conclusion: A Shared Responsibility
As we stand on the precipice of potential volcanic eruptions, it is crucial that we confront the bipartisan habit of selective memory. Both the left and the right must embrace a more comprehensive view of our environmental challenges, recognizing that the stakes are too high for political gamesmanship. Only then can we hope to address the impending threats posed by nature with the seriousness they demand.
✦ ✦ ✦