May 1988 · National edition

Health

Food Safety Recall: The Bipartisan Habit Of Selective Memory

A Health desk reading of food safety recall, filed 1988-05.

From the file. Written for the paper dated May 1988. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In the ongoing debate surrounding food safety regulations, both political parties seem to exhibit a disconcerting pattern of selective memory. As food safety recalls continue to make headlines, attention must be paid to the consequences of neglecting the larger implications of our food supply.

A color photograph of the Bolduc House in Ste Genevieve MO
A color photograph of the Bolduc House in Ste Genevieve MO. Photo: Jack Boucher via Wikimedia Commons

Recalls on the Rise

Recently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a significant recall of contaminated beef, stirring public concern over food safety standards. This incident is not isolated; it follows a series of recalls involving various food products, from produce to dairy. As consumers, our trust in the food supply chain is increasingly being tested.

Yet, while the media focuses on specific instances of contamination, it is crucial to remember the broader context. Both the Republican and Democratic parties have, at various times, championed reform in food safety regulations. However, the reality is that neither side has delivered consistently on their promises. Each party's selective memory about past failures, regulatory shortcomings, and their own complicity is troubling.

New Orleans Marine Hospital, 1981. "Jazz funeral" style procession to mourn closing of Public Health Service Marine Hospital. Participants second lining with um
New Orleans Marine Hospital, 1981. "Jazz funeral" style procession to mourn closing of Public Health Service Marine Hospital. Participants second lining with umbrellas raised. Photo: Photographer not credited via Wikimedia Commons

The Right's Oversight

On one hand, conservative lawmakers have often prioritized deregulation, arguing that business interests should take precedence over government oversight. This laissez-faire approach has led to a relaxing of standards that, in theory, should protect consumers. When recalls occur, however, these same lawmakers are quick to distance themselves from the consequences of their policies.

"It is easy to criticize the government for failures in food safety when one has contributed to dismantling the very regulations designed to protect us."

Take, for instance, the recent push against the establishment of mandatory inspections for meat processing facilities. Advocates for deregulation argue that imposing such requirements burdens small businesses. However, when contamination leads to illness and death, the repercussions are felt across the board, impacting not just consumers but also the very businesses these lawmakers claim to protect.

The Left's Hypocrisy

The left, on the other hand, often takes a reactive stance, demanding accountability only after a crisis occurs. While it is commendable to call for stricter regulations and protections for consumers, it is hypocritical to ignore the fact that previous administrations have also failed to enforce existing laws adequately. The Democrats have had their share of neglect, failing to maintain the momentum needed to keep food safety a priority when they held the levers of power.

"To demand change only in the aftermath of a tragedy is not leadership; it is an abdication of responsibility."

This pattern creates a vicious cycle where both parties engage in a blame game, distracting from their shared accountability. The public remains caught in the crossfire, left to navigate a food landscape that, at times, feels increasingly perilous.

A Call for Genuine Reform

What is needed is a comprehensive approach that transcends party lines. The American consumer deserves a food safety system that prioritizes health over politics. This means not only enforcing existing regulations but also investing in research and development for better safety practices. Both parties must be willing to put aside their partisan differences and acknowledge the importance of food safety as a public health issue.

As we witness another food safety recall, let us not fall into the trap of selective memory, where the past is conveniently forgotten when it serves our political interests. Instead, we must hold both sides accountable and demand that they work together for meaningful change.


The Way Forward

In conclusion, the issue of food safety is not merely a political football to be tossed around during election cycles. It is a fundamental concern that affects every American. We must demand that our leaders not only acknowledge their past mistakes but also commit to a future where food safety is prioritized over political gain.

It is time for both the left and the right to step up and confront the reality of food safety with honesty and integrity. Only then can we hope to restore public trust in our food supply and ensure the safety of our families.

✦ ✦ ✦