From the file. Written for the paper dated December 1987. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.
As we stand on the precipice of a new era in technology, the recent breakthroughs in computing have ignited a wave of excitement across the nation. Yet, amid this enthusiasm, a troubling trend has emerged: the bipartisan habit of selective memory regarding the implications of these advancements.

The Promise of Computing
In December 1987, the world of computers is buzzing with the promise of innovation. The announcements surrounding developments in microprocessors, artificial intelligence, and personal computing are nothing short of revolutionary. Companies like IBM and Apple are racing to enhance their offerings, and the implications for both industry and daily life are profound. As computers become more powerful and accessible, they hold the potential to transform how we work, communicate, and engage with the world.
However, this excitement over technological progress is often accompanied by a tendency among politicians and pundits to gloss over the challenges posed by these advancements. The left and right seem united in their selective memory, each side picking and choosing which aspects of technology to highlight while ignoring others.

Left-Wing Optimism
The left has long championed the idea that technology can serve as a great equalizer. They advocate for increased investment in education and technology to ensure that underprivileged communities can access the opportunities that new advancements bring. Yet, while they celebrate the democratization of technology, there is a reluctance to address the disparities that persist. The digital divide between affluent urban centers and rural enclaves is a stark reminder that not everyone has equal access to these tools. A focus solely on the positive aspects of technological advancements can lead to a dangerous complacency.
Right-Wing Skepticism
On the other hand, the right often embraces a narrative steeped in skepticism. Many conservatives express concerns about the implications of technological advancements on traditional values and jobs. They warn against an overreliance on machines, fearing that automation will lead to widespread unemployment. However, in their fervor to protect the status quo, they sometimes overlook the potential for technology to create new industries and job opportunities. Like their counterparts on the left, they risk falling into the trap of selective memory by focusing on the negatives without acknowledging the benefits that innovation can bring.
"In the race to harness technology, both sides of the aisle risk overlooking the broader implications of their narratives."
A Call for Nuanced Discourse
As we navigate this complex landscape, a call for nuanced discourse is essential. Both left and right must engage in a more holistic conversation about technology’s role in society. The advancements we are witnessing are not inherently good or bad; rather, their impact will depend on how we choose to integrate them into our lives and policies. It is critical for political leaders to confront the realities of technological change, acknowledging both the challenges and the opportunities it presents.
Moreover, the public must also take an active role in this discourse. Citizens should demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, urging them to move beyond soundbites and engage in substantive discussions about the future of technology. This is not merely a political issue; it is a societal one that affects everyone, from the factory worker to the tech entrepreneur.
Looking Ahead
As we look to the future, it is essential to remember that technological breakthroughs are not isolated events but rather part of an ongoing evolution. The choices we make today will shape the landscape of tomorrow. Will we embrace the potential of technology to uplift all members of society, or will we allow our political biases to cloud our judgment?
In the coming months and years, as we continue to witness remarkable advancements in computing, let us strive for a deeper understanding that transcends partisan divides. If we can collectively acknowledge the complexities of technology, we may just harness its full potential for the benefit of all.
✦ ✦ ✦