From the file. Written for the paper dated December 1986. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.
The auto industry stands at a crossroads in December 1986, with a landscape shaped by both the excesses of the left and the right. As we examine the current state of affairs, it becomes increasingly clear that both sides of the political spectrum have engaged in a troubling game of selective memory, choosing to ignore the lessons of the past while pushing their agendas for the future.

The Left's Amnesia
On the left, the focus has been on environmental concerns and the promotion of fuel-efficient vehicles. While these issues are undeniably important, the narrative often overlooks the significant contributions the auto industry has made to the economy and job creation. The Democratic agenda, particularly with its emphasis on regulation, risks alienating the very workers it aims to protect. Labor unions, once a powerful force in the industry, are finding themselves at odds with their own members who fear that too much regulation could stifle innovation and job opportunities.
"Selective memory is a bipartisan ailment, with both sides forgetting the lessons of the past."
Moreover, the left's critique of American car manufacturers often ignores the global competition that has reshaped the market. Japanese automakers have gained a foothold in the U.S. largely due to their ability to produce inexpensive, reliable vehicles. Instead of embracing this challenge, some on the left prefer to blame American companies for their struggles without addressing the larger economic realities that impact all manufacturers.

The Right's Short-Sightedness
Conversely, the right has been quick to champion the auto industry as a symbol of American ingenuity and independence. While it is commendable to support domestic manufacturers, this enthusiasm can lead to a neglect of pressing issues such as safety standards and environmental regulations. The push for deregulation often comes at the cost of accountability, leaving consumers vulnerable to unsafe vehicles and practices.
Furthermore, the right's narrative often fails to acknowledge the auto industry's own missteps, such as neglecting to invest in new technologies that could enhance vehicle safety and efficiency. By promoting a one-dimensional view of American exceptionalism, some conservative voices ignore the need for evolution and improvement within the industry - a dangerous oversight in a rapidly changing global market.
Shared Blind Spots
Both sides exhibit a troubling tendency to ignore inconvenient truths. The left often romanticizes the idea of the American worker while failing to recognize the need for the auto industry to adapt to changing consumer demands and technological advancements. Meanwhile, the right's unwavering support for the status quo can hinder innovation and accountability, jeopardizing the long-term health of the industry.
"A true understanding of the auto industry requires a nuanced approach that acknowledges both challenges and opportunities."
As we enter the final weeks of 1986, the auto industry is facing significant challenges, from fluctuating oil prices to increasing competition. Both political factions must confront the realities of the market with a clear-eyed perspective that transcends partisan rhetoric. It is not enough to simply advocate for one side of the debate or the other; a balanced approach is necessary to ensure the industry's sustainability.
Looking Ahead
The future of the auto industry hinges on our collective ability to address the complexities of the current landscape. Policymakers must be willing to engage in meaningful dialogue that considers both the economic realities facing manufacturers and the environmental concerns of consumers. This will require a departure from the selective memory that has plagued both the left and the right, as well as a commitment to fostering innovation and accountability.
In summary, the auto industry's current state is a reflection of our broader political discourse - a landscape marked by selective memory and partisan excesses. As we move forward, it is essential that all stakeholders engage in an honest evaluation of the past while looking toward a sustainable future.
✦ ✦ ✦