December 1985 · National edition

The Nation

Federalism Clash: The Bipartisan Habit Of Selective Memory

A The Nation desk reading of federalism clash, filed 1985-12.

From the file. Written for the paper dated December 1985. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As the nation stands at a crossroads of political ideology, the clash of federalism has become a prominent subject of discussion, exposing the bipartisan habit of selective memory among politicians and constituents alike.

President Ronald Reagan Nancy Reagan During The State Visit of President Soeharto of Indonesia and Mrs Soeharto in The Residence
President Ronald Reagan Nancy Reagan During The State Visit of President Soeharto of Indonesia and Mrs Soeharto in The Residence. Photo: The White House

The Roots of Federalism in Modern Politics

Federalism, the distribution of power between the national and state governments, has been a foundational principle of American governance since the Constitution’s inception. Yet, today, it seems that both sides of the political spectrum have adopted a selective memory when it comes to its interpretation and application. Politicians from the left and right, often quick to champion states’ rights or federal authority, conveniently forget their past stances when politically expedient.

The Left's Lamentations

On the left, there has been a marked emphasis on social justice and civil rights in recent years. Yet, these advocates often overlook the historical context of federalism in their critiques of governmental overreach. When the federal government steps in to enforce civil rights legislation, it is hailed as a necessary means of progress. However, when similar federal actions are taken in other areas, such as environmental regulations or even economic policies, these same voices can be surprisingly silent or even critical.

President Ronald Reagan and Vice-President Bush Meet with Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev on Governor'S Island New York
President Ronald Reagan and Vice-President Bush Meet with Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev on Governor'S Island New York. Photo: The White House
"The irony lies in their selective advocacy; they champion federal intervention when it aligns with their agenda but decry it when it doesn't."

The Right's Reversion

Conversely, those on the right have long been champions of states’ rights, often invoking the Tenth Amendment as a bulwark against federal authority. Yet, when it comes to issues like drug enforcement or education, there is an alarming tendency to favor federal control. The current administration's push for federal drug enforcement in states that have decriminalized marijuana exemplifies this hypocrisy. It begs the question: what happened to the reverence for state sovereignty?

"The right's embrace of federal power in these instances showcases a profound inconsistency that undermines their foundational arguments."

Consequences of Selective Memory

The implications of this bipartisan selective memory extend beyond political rhetoric. It creates a fractured discourse where citizens are left confused about the values their representatives genuinely uphold. Voters must grapple with the reality that their leaders may not be as committed to the principles of federalism as they profess. This inconsistency breeds disillusionment and contributes to the growing polarization we see in our political landscape.

A Call for Genuine Discourse

What we need now more than ever is a revival of genuine discourse around federalism, one that transcends party lines. It is imperative that we hold our leaders accountable to the principles they espouse, rather than allowing them to pick and choose when federalism suits their needs. This is not a call for a one-size-fits-all approach to governance, but rather an appeal for consistency and integrity in our political discussions.

By fostering a culture of accountability and critical thinking, we can begin to dismantle the barriers that this selective memory has erected. Voters deserve clarity about the principles guiding their representatives' decisions, and it is incumbent upon us as a society to demand it.


Looking Forward

As we approach the next election cycle, we must pay close attention to the narratives surrounding federalism. The stakes are high, and the implications of our leaders' choices will resonate far beyond the immediate political climate. A commitment to true federalism requires vigilance and an unwavering dedication to the principles that underpin our democracy.

It is time to move beyond selective memory. Let us advocate for a political environment where both the left and right can articulate a unified vision for federalism that honors states' rights while acknowledging the essential role of federal oversight. Only then can we hope to heal the divisions that plague our nation.

✦ ✦ ✦