From the file. Written for the paper dated July 1984. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.
In a season marked by escalating natural disasters and rising political tensions, the recent disaster declaration by the federal government has revealed a troubling trend: the bipartisan habit of selective memory regarding disaster response and recovery.

As we witness the fallout from floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes across the country, it is imperative to examine how both political parties have historically approached disaster declarations and aid. This moment serves as a stark reminder of how political agendas can distort the reality of disaster relief, often leading to a disconnect between the actual needs of affected communities and the responses orchestrated by their leaders.
The Political Landscape
In the wake of catastrophic events, we often see political leaders rushing to the scene, offering words of sympathy and promises of assistance. However, as the dust settles, selective memory takes hold. Both Republicans and Democrats have been guilty of leveraging disasters for political gain, while simultaneously forgetting the needs of the very citizens they vow to help.

For instance, in recent years, we have seen Democratic leaders champion robust federal disaster aid when their party is in power, only to criticize similar efforts when the tables turn. Conversely, Republicans often advocate for fiscal conservatism during times of plenty, yet eagerly support disaster relief when calamity strikes in their own constituencies. This pattern creates an unsettling cycle of inconsistency, where the need for immediate assistance is overshadowed by partisan posturing.
"The devastation of our communities should not be a political football."
Selective Memory in Action
Take, for example, the disaster declarations made in response to the recent floods in the Midwest. As Congress debates the merits of federal assistance, both sides have resorted to cherry-picking statistics and anecdotes to bolster their arguments. Democrats emphasize the urgency of aid due to the suffering of families displaced from their homes, while Republicans point to the need for budgetary restraint and fiscal responsibility. In doing so, both parties risk losing sight of the true purpose of disaster declarations: to provide timely assistance and support to those in need.
Moreover, the media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception during these crises. Coverage often highlights the political implications of disasters rather than focusing on the human stories behind them. As reporters chase ratings and headlines, the nuanced realities of recovery efforts can become secondary, leaving the affected communities feeling neglected and unheard.
A Call for Accountability
What is needed now is accountability from both sides of the aisle. Lawmakers must remember that disaster declarations should not be weaponized for political gain. They must prioritize the immediate needs of their constituents over partisan politics. Furthermore, citizens must remain vigilant, holding their representatives accountable for their promises of assistance and ensuring that the needs of disaster victims are met without delay.
In this era of escalating climate disasters, it is crucial for both political parties to acknowledge the reality of our changing environment. As the frequency and severity of these events increase, so too must our commitment to equitable disaster response. It is not enough to simply declare a disaster and offer empty assurances of aid; we must take a proactive approach to ensure resources are available when and where they are needed most.
Moving Forward
As we look to the future, it is essential to foster a culture of collaboration and cooperation between political parties. Disaster response should transcend partisanship and become a unifying cause that reflects our shared humanity. By working together, we can create a more resilient framework for disaster response that prioritizes the needs of our communities and holds our leaders accountable.
Let us challenge our elected officials to move beyond selective memory and take meaningful action in the face of disaster. It is time to put politics aside and focus on what truly matters: the lives and livelihoods of our fellow citizens.
✦ ✦ ✦