October 1983 · National edition

Opinion

A Clearer Reading of Process Over Performance

A Opinion desk reading of process over performance, filed 1983-10.

From the file. Written for the paper dated October 1983. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As partisanship increasingly colors the political landscape, the debate over process versus performance has become a focal point of national discourse. While both sides of the aisle champion their own visions for America, a critical examination reveals that neither party is wholly innocent of sacrificing substantive governance for the sake of political theatrics.

774 Redbud Lane Greenwood Indiana
774 Redbud Lane Greenwood Indiana. Photo: Bart Everson via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

The Rhetoric of Process

In the corridors of power, the word 'process' is often thrown around as a rallying cry. For many on the left, it signifies a commitment to inclusivity and transparency, a promise to involve a wider array of voices in decision-making. Yet, too frequently, this approach morphs into a bureaucratic quagmire that prioritizes endless discussion over decisive action. The noble ideals of public participation can become an excuse for inaction, allowing the left to sidestep accountability while basking in the glow of good intentions.

On the right, the emphasis on performance is often cloaked in the language of results. Politicians tout their accomplishments, claiming credit for every job created and every tax cut delivered. However, this focus on performance can lead to a troubling disregard for the processes that underpin effective governance. As the right rushes to showcase achievements, they risk overlooking the critical frameworks that ensure those accomplishments are sustainable and equitable.

Chris Shoe Repair, N. Limestone Street, Springfield, Ohio 1980
Chris Shoe Repair, N. Limestone Street, Springfield, Ohio 1980. Photo: John Margolies via Wikimedia Commons

What Gets Left Out

In this climate, what is often left out of the briefings is a genuine commitment to the underlying values that should guide both process and performance. The left's obsession with extended processes can lead to a disconnect with the very citizens they seek to serve. Public forums often devolve into echo chambers, where the loudest voices drown out more moderate opinions. This not only frustrates constituents but also alienates those who may have valuable insights to contribute.

Conversely, the right's relentless push for quick results often overlooks the necessity of thorough analysis and thoughtful deliberation. This can culminate in policies that, while initially popular, may prove ineffective or even detrimental in the long term. The rush to fulfill campaign promises can result in a lack of careful consideration, leading to a cycle of disillusionment among voters when the promised benefits fail to materialize.

"What we need is not just a focus on results, but a commitment to the processes that yield those results."

The Pitfalls of Political Excess

Both extremes exhibit a troubling tendency to demonize the other side. The left often frames the right as greedy and indifferent to the needs of the average American, while the right characterizes the left as naive and overly reliant on government solutions. This entrenched animosity not only stifles meaningful dialogue but also perpetuates a cycle of blame that ultimately detracts from effective governance.

As we move deeper into the political season, it is imperative that both sides recognize the importance of balancing process with performance. The left must strive to ensure that their processes do not become a barrier to action, while the right should acknowledge that their performance metrics must be built upon a solid foundation of sound policy. The true measure of success lies not in political posturing, but in the tangible benefits delivered to the American people.

Moving Forward

To break free from this cycle of excess, a shift in focus is necessary. Both parties need to embrace a more holistic approach that values not only what is done but how it is done. This means fostering an environment where diverse voices are heard and respected, while also ensuring that policies are crafted with foresight and care.

Furthermore, the media plays a crucial role in this dynamic. Coverage that focuses solely on the spectacle of political maneuvering discourages genuine engagement with important issues. Journalists must challenge themselves to go beyond the headlines, providing deeper analyses that highlight the complexities of policy-making and the real-life implications of political decisions.


The Path Ahead

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the call for a more nuanced understanding of governance becomes ever more pressing. By recognizing the value of both process and performance, and by fostering an environment of constructive dialogue, we can begin to transcend the excesses that currently plague our political system. Only then can we hope to forge a path that truly serves the best interests of all Americans.

✦ ✦ ✦