February 1980 · National edition

Opinion

The Week in Media Incentives

A Opinion desk reading of media incentives, filed 1980-02.

From the file. Written for the paper dated February 1980. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In a time when our nation is wrestling with significant issues, from the economy to foreign relations, the media stands as a crucial player in shaping public perception. Yet, the selective memory exhibited by both left and right factions is undermining the integrity of our national discourse.

774 Redbud Lane Greenwood Indiana
774 Redbud Lane Greenwood Indiana. Photo: Bart Everson via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

The Left's Convenient Amnesia

The left side of the political spectrum often champions social justice, equality, and the need for government intervention. While these ideals are commendable, there is a tendency to overlook the failures of past liberal policies that have contributed to the current economic malaise. The media, particularly those outlets leaning left, sometimes gloss over the consequences of the Great Society initiatives of the 1960s, which, while well-intentioned, have led to a dependency on welfare and an inflated government bureaucracy.

Take, for instance, the ongoing struggles of urban centers. Many media narratives focus solely on the plight of the disadvantaged without critically examining how previous liberal policies might have inadvertently perpetuated cycles of poverty. This selective memory not only shields liberal ideologies from scrutiny but also limits the potential for genuine reform. The media's failure to hold its own side accountable results in a distorted view of the past and present, further complicating the path to solutions.

Greenwood, circa 1984
Greenwood, circa 1984. Photo: Bart Everson from New Orleans, Louisiana, USA via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

The Right's Overlooked Lessons

Conversely, the right is equally guilty of selective memory, particularly regarding the economic policies of the Reagan administration. Many conservatives herald tax cuts as the panacea for economic woes, yet they conveniently forget the ballooning deficits that followed. The media's right-leaning outlets often emphasize the triumphs of deregulation and free-market policies while downplaying the ramifications of these approaches, such as increased inequality and environmental degradation.

Instead of fostering a robust debate, the media's portrayal of right-wing policies tends to romanticize their successes while neglecting the lessons learned from failures. This selective remembrance creates an echo chamber where conservative ideologies remain unchallenged, stifling potential discourse that could lead to more effective solutions.

"The selective memory exhibited by both left and right factions is undermining the integrity of our national discourse."

The Role of Media in Shaping Memory

As custodians of information, the media has a responsibility to provide a balanced and comprehensive view of history. However, in the current climate, it often falls short. Both sides of the political spectrum have their respective media outlets that cater to their biases, resulting in a fragmented information landscape. This not only skews public understanding but also fosters division among the populace.

Moreover, the sensationalism often present in news reporting can overshadow the more nuanced discussions necessary for addressing the complexities of our society. The focus on ratings and viewership can lead to a prioritization of entertainment over substance, further entrenching the selective memory that plagues our political dialogue.

Bridging the Divide

To move forward, it is essential for media outlets to adopt a more responsible approach in their reporting. This means confronting uncomfortable truths, regardless of political alignment. By acknowledging the failures of both liberal and conservative policies, the media can foster a more productive dialogue that encourages accountability and genuine progress.

This entails inviting voices from across the political spectrum to contribute to the conversation. Diverse perspectives can foster understanding and bridge the divides that currently separate us. It is time for the media to transcend its partisan leanings and strive for a more equitable representation of history and current events.

Conclusion

The bipartisan habit of selective memory not only hinders progress but also undermines the fundamental principles of democracy. A healthy discourse relies on an informed electorate, and the media plays a pivotal role in shaping that understanding. If both left and right factions continue to ignore the lessons of the past and perpetuate an incomplete narrative, we risk losing the opportunity for meaningful change in our society.

✦ ✦ ✦