February 1979 · National edition

Science

Space Launch: The Bipartisan Habit Of Selective Memory

A Science desk reading of space launch, filed 1979-02.

From the file. Written for the paper dated February 1979. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As the United States prepares for another ambitious space launch, a curious pattern emerges among the political classes: a troubling habit of selective memory that seems to transcend party lines.

Early Rockets
Early Rockets. Photo: NASA

Rediscovering the Moon

In the wake of the Apollo missions, the American public was captivated by the thrilling prospect of space exploration. The moon landings were not just a series of scientific achievements; they were a testament to American ingenuity and resolve. Yet, as our gaze turns to future missions, both political parties seem to conveniently forget the lessons of the past. The right touts the success of Apollo as evidence of their commitment to free enterprise and technological advancement, while the left emphasizes the importance of government funding for science without acknowledging the broader context of bipartisan support that made those missions possible.

For instance, President Nixon, a Republican, laid the groundwork for the Apollo program, but it was a Democrat, President Kennedy, who famously galvanized the nation with his vision of reaching the moon. This rich history of collaboration is now overshadowed by partisan bickering that detracts from a unified approach to space exploration.

Ksc-77pp-229
Ksc-77pp-229. Photo: NASA
"The moon landings were not just a series of scientific achievements; they were a testament to American ingenuity and resolve."

Funding Follies

Both sides of the aisle now engage in a dangerous game of budgetary brinkmanship when it comes to funding NASA and other scientific initiatives. The right often calls for slashing government spending, advocating for a leaner budget that could jeopardize future space exploration missions. Meanwhile, the left is quick to point out the need for increased funding for scientific research, yet they often overlook their own history of supporting cuts when it suited their agenda.

This political posturing is not merely a matter of fiscal policy; it is a direct threat to the progress of science and technology in our nation. The bipartisan habit of selective memory allows each party to ignore their own past failings while painting the other as the enemy of science. This back-and-forth does a disservice to the legacy of exploration and discovery that we owe to the American spirit.

Public Perception

The American public, meanwhile, finds itself caught in the crossfire of this political tug-of-war. In recent years, public interest in space exploration has waned, with many Americans believing that the moon landings were a once-in-a-lifetime achievement rather than the start of a continuing journey. This perception is partially fueled by the political landscape, with both parties failing to inspire the next generation of scientists and explorers.

For the right, there is a tendency to frame scientific advancement through the lens of competition and national pride, often neglecting the collaborative efforts that have historically driven progress. For the left, the focus on environmental issues and social justice often overshadows the importance of investing in scientific endeavors that could yield long-term benefits for all. This selective memory leads to a fragmented public understanding of the significance of space exploration.

Looking Ahead

As we prepare for upcoming missions, it is imperative that we break free from the shackles of partisan politics and embrace a holistic view of our space endeavors. The lessons learned from Apollo should not be relegated to the past but should serve as a guiding light for future exploration. We must recognize that space exploration is not merely a scientific pursuit but a unifying force that can inspire generations to come.

It is time for both sides to put aside their political differences and commit to a bipartisan approach that acknowledges the contributions of all who have come before us. The future of space exploration depends not on who gets credit but on a collective commitment to advance our understanding of the universe.


Conclusion

In conclusion, as we stand on the brink of a new era in space exploration, let us not forget the collaborative spirit that brought us to this point. Both the left and the right must acknowledge their shared history and work together to foster an environment that prioritizes scientific advancement over political gain. Only then can we hope to inspire the next generation of explorers who will carry the torch of discovery into the stars.

✦ ✦ ✦