September 1977 · National edition

The Nation

The Week in Public Trust Survey

A The Nation desk reading of public trust survey, filed 1977-09.

From the file. Written for the paper dated September 1977. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In an era where public trust seems to be a commodity in short supply, recent surveys reveal an alarming trend: Americans are increasingly skeptical of institutions that once held a degree of reverence. Amidst this climate, both the left and right are guilty of a selective memory that serves their own narratives, often at the expense of a united public discourse.

President Gerald Ford, Chief of Staff Donald Rumsfeld, and David Hume Kennerly, Personal Photographer to the President, following a Tennis Match on the White Ho
President Gerald Ford, Chief of Staff Donald Rumsfeld, and David Hume Kennerly, Personal Photographer to the President, following a Tennis Match on the White House Tennis Courts. Photo: Ricardo Thomas via Wikimedia Commons

The Current Landscape of Trust

The latest public trust survey illustrates a striking divergence in the perception of government institutions, media, and even fellow citizens. As the results come in, it becomes evident that trust in Congress teeters at an all-time low, while faith in the presidency fluctuates with the winds of political rhetoric. Interestingly, trust in the media has not fared much better, with many Americans questioning the objectivity of news sources. This skepticism raises a critical question: What has led us to this juncture?

"Trust is the currency of democracy, but it appears to be in a deep recession."

Selectivity of Memory

In dissecting the survey results, a pattern emerges that reveals a bipartisan tendency toward selective memory. The left often recalls the Watergate scandal as a cautionary tale against the abuses of power, framing it as a watershed moment for accountability. Yet, they seem to gloss over the excesses that have arisen within progressive movements, such as the violent protests that have occasionally marred peaceful demonstrations. Such incidents undermine their calls for reform by portraying a chaotic narrative that many Americans find unsettling.

Jimmy Carter with his grandson, Jason Carter, and Amy Carter in a tree house on the White House grounds.
Jimmy Carter with his grandson, Jason Carter, and Amy Carter in a tree house on the White House grounds. Photo: National Archives

Conversely, the right often invokes the legacy of the Great Society programs, arguing that they birthed a culture of dependency that has eroded personal responsibility and self-reliance. Yet, this criticism overlooks the profound social advancements those programs achieved, such as civil rights and healthcare access for marginalized groups. In their zeal to critique, they often forget the positive outcomes that are inconvenient to their narrative.

The Role of the Media

The media plays a pivotal role in this selective memory game. Headlines often emphasize sensational stories that cater to the extremes of both sides. This not only skews public perception but also perpetuates the cycle of mistrust. When news outlets prioritize ratings over responsible journalism, they contribute to the very skepticism they claim to report on. As a result, Americans are left to navigate a landscape saturated with misinformation and half-truths.

A Call for Honest Discourse

It is vital that both sides of the political spectrum confront their own historical narratives with honesty. Acknowledging past mistakes does not equate to weakness; rather, it demonstrates a commitment to progress and accountability. If the left can embrace the complexities of its past, it may find a stronger foundation for its future arguments. Likewise, if the right can recognize the value of social programs that have uplifted countless lives, it can bolster its claims for a more equitable society.

In this time of deepening division, the American public deserves leaders who can rise above the fray and engage in meaningful dialogue. Partisan excesses have only served to alienate constituents, creating an atmosphere where collaboration becomes a rare commodity. The public trust survey can serve as a wake-up call, urging both sides to reflect on their rhetoric and the implications it has on the collective psyche of our nation.

Moving Forward

As we look ahead, fostering an environment of trust requires a concerted effort from all parties involved. Politicians must strive for transparency, while the media must commit to unbiased reporting. Only then can the nation begin to rebuild the trust that has eroded over time. This is not merely a political issue; it is a societal one that affects the very fabric of our democracy.


✦ ✦ ✦