February 1977 · National edition

Opinion

A Clearer Reading of Process Over Performance

A Opinion desk reading of process over performance, filed 1977-02.

From the file. Written for the paper dated February 1977. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In a political climate increasingly dominated by the theatrics of performance, it is crucial to advocate for a return to a more substantive focus on process. Institutions, whether governmental or corporate, often prioritize their own survival over the very principles they were founded upon, leading to a disconnection from the public they serve.

Citizen of Utica, a Small Town West of Lincoln
Citizen of Utica, a Small Town West of Lincoln. Photo: National Archives

The Illusion of Performance

Over the past few years, we have witnessed a worrying trend where the art of performance has eclipsed genuine results. Politicians, in a desperate bid to gain popularity, have resorted to grandstanding and empty promises. This spectacle diverts attention from the critical issues that impact the daily lives of ordinary citizens. The recent political rallies, for instance, have become more about the sensationalism of the moment rather than meaningful discourse on policy.

"The show must go on" seems to be the motto of many politicians, but at what cost?

Institutional Self-Preservation

Institutions are not immune to this trend. In fact, they often become the very engines of performance over process. The bureaucratic tendency to protect their own interests can lead to a culture of self-preservation that stifles innovation and accountability. When institutions prioritize their own survival, they risk losing sight of their foundational mission, ultimately alienating the very constituents they are meant to serve.

Main Street of Dehue, West Virginia, a Youngstown Steel Corporation Company Town near Logan
Main Street of Dehue, West Virginia, a Youngstown Steel Corporation Company Town near Logan. Photo: National Archives

Consider the recent actions taken by certain agencies in response to public scrutiny. Instead of addressing the legitimate concerns raised by citizens, many have chosen to double down on their existing protocols, favoring bureaucratic processes over meaningful reform. This reluctance to adapt often leaves the public feeling unheard and disenfranchised.

A Call for Transparency

Transparency is key to reversing this trend. Institutions must commit to open communication with the public, ensuring that their processes are not shrouded in secrecy. When citizens are informed about how decisions are made, they are more likely to engage with and trust their institutions. This trust is essential for a functioning democracy, as it fosters a sense of community and shared responsibility.

Moreover, transparency can act as a catalyst for accountability. When institutions know they are being watched, they may be less inclined to prioritize performance over process. It is imperative that we demand more from our leaders and institutions, holding them accountable for their actions rather than merely applauding their ability to entertain.

Challenges on Both Sides

It is important to recognize that both ends of the political spectrum are guilty of leaning too heavily on performance. On the left, there is a tendency to push for rapid change without adequately considering the processes needed to implement these changes effectively. While the desire for social justice and reform is commendable, it often leads to hasty decisions that lack the necessary groundwork to ensure success.

Conversely, the right often champions tradition and stability but may become so entrenched in their processes that they resist necessary change. This rigidity can create an environment where progress is stifled, and innovative solutions are dismissed outright. Both extremes must recognize the value of a balanced approach that prioritizes process without neglecting the need for performance.

A Path Forward

To forge a path forward, we must advocate for a renewed focus on process. This involves a commitment to thoughtful deliberation, collaboration, and a willingness to adapt. It requires leaders who prioritize the needs of their constituents over the allure of performance. We must encourage a culture that values listening and learning, rather than merely reacting.

As citizens, we have a role to play in this shift as well. We must hold our leaders accountable for their actions and demand transparency in their decision-making processes. Engaging in civic discourse and advocating for constructive change can help ensure that our institutions serve their intended purpose: to enhance the well-being of all citizens.

In conclusion, while the allure of performance may be tempting, it is the processes that underpin our institutions that ultimately determine their effectiveness. We must strive for a political culture that values substance over spectacle, ensuring that our institutions remain accountable and responsive to the needs of the public.

✦ ✦ ✦