From the file. Written for the paper dated December 1970. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.
In a world increasingly defined by division, the commodity of outrage has emerged, and it seems to be selling briskly. Both ends of the political spectrum have found a lucrative market for indignation, exploiting emotions to rally support and, ultimately, profit.
Outrage as a Currency
Outrage has become a currency in our contemporary discourse, traded between factions that seek to amplify their voices through anger rather than reason. The left, with its fervent claims of social justice and equality, often erupts with indignation over perceived injustices, sometimes losing sight of the nuanced discussions that could lead to genuine solutions. Meanwhile, the right capitalizes on fear and resentment, rallying their base with cries of impending doom from liberal policies that threaten the very fabric of American society.
It is perplexing that, in this era of unprecedented access to information, our society seems to favor certainty over complexity. Outrage, while an emotional response, provides a sense of clarity in a world filled with ambiguity. When a figure on the political stage declares a sweeping statement, it is easy to rally behind it, forsaking the hard work of grappling with the intricacies of the issues at hand. Certainty sells, and outrage is a powerful tool in the hands of those who know how to wield it.
Leftist Outrage: A Double-Edged Sword
On the left, the fervor for social change has ignited a passion among many activists, but it has also led to a tendency to dismiss dissenting views outright. Take, for example, the recent protests against the Vietnam War. While the intention to oppose an unjust war is honorable, the tactics employed by some groups have sometimes alienated those who might otherwise support their cause. The loudest voices often drown out reasoned debate, leaving little room for those who may share concerns but differ on solutions.
Moreover, the left's obsession with purity in activism can create a culture of outrage that is more concerned with ideological conformity than effective progress. This has resulted in a splintering of movements, where factions are more interested in calling out perceived betrayal than in building coalitions for change. The irony is that in their pursuit of justice, some have inadvertently stifled the very dialogue necessary to foster understanding and consensus.
The Right's Fear-Mongering
Conversely, the right has mastered the art of fear-mongering, often using outrage to rally their supporters against an ever-growing list of perceived threats. Whether it is the specter of communism or the dangers of immigration, the drumbeat of alarm has resonated through their ranks. This tactic not only stirs the emotions but also fosters a sense of urgency that compels individuals to act without fully considering the implications of their actions.
What is particularly troubling is the tendency for these alarmist narratives to overshadow the voices of moderation within the right. Many conservatives are advocating for thoughtful and rational discourse, yet they find themselves drowned out by the cacophony of outrage that characterizes much of the current political landscape. The result is a political environment where the loudest voices often dominate, and the more measured perspectives are sidelined.
The Dangers of Outrage Culture
Both sides of the political divide are guilty of fostering an environment where outrage is not just acceptable, but expected. This culture of outrage can lead to a cycle of escalating tensions, where each side is more inclined to respond to provocation with vitriol rather than reasoned debate. As a society, we must ask ourselves whether we want to be defined by our anger or by our capacity for dialogue.
The consequences of this outrage culture are already manifesting in our communities. Friends and families are fractured over political disagreements, workplaces are becoming battlegrounds for ideological clashes, and the civil discourse that once characterized American life seems to be slipping away. When certainty becomes the selling point, we risk losing sight of our shared humanity.
"In their pursuit of justice, some have inadvertently stifled the very dialogue necessary to foster understanding and consensus."
Finding the Middle Ground
To navigate this turbulent political climate, we must strive for a balance between passionate advocacy and constructive dialogue. It is crucial to recognize that while outrage can be a catalyst for change, it can also be a barrier to understanding. Instead of allowing anger to dictate our responses, we should aspire to engage with opposing viewpoints and seek common ground.
This does not mean that we should shy away from advocating for what we believe in. Rather, it requires us to approach our convictions with humility, recognizing that the world is rife with complexities that defy easy categorization. By fostering an atmosphere of respectful discourse, we can begin to dismantle the walls that divide us and work toward a more inclusive society.
✦ ✦ ✦