May 2026 · National edition

Commerce

On Housing Starts, and the bipartisan habit of selective memory

A Commerce desk reading of housing starts, filed 2026-05.

From the file. Written for the paper dated May 2026. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As housing starts show signs of recovery, both major political parties find themselves engaged in a well-rehearsed dance of selective memory, each claiming credit while conveniently ignoring the complex realities that shaped the housing landscape.

The Seville Discount Store, a local grocery store on the northwest corner of Lake George Road and U.S. Route 17 in Seville, Florida.
The Seville Discount Store, a local grocery store on the northwest corner of Lake George Road and U.S. Route 17 in Seville, Florida. Photo: DanTD via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Current State of Housing Starts

According to the latest reports, housing starts in April 2026 have shown a notable increase of approximately 12 percent compared to the previous month. This surge is being hailed by some as a sign of economic resilience, while others remain skeptical, citing persistent affordability issues and supply chain challenges that continue to plague the construction industry.

X post from @WhiteHouse
X thread screenshot · frame 1/3 @WhiteHouse - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

The increase in housing starts, however, invites scrutiny. For the left, it is a moment to celebrate the fruits of government investment in infrastructure and affordable housing initiatives. Yet, this perspective often glosses over the reality that many of these projects are still in their infancy and have yet to impact the market meaningfully. On the right, politicians are quick to attribute the uptick to deregulation and tax cuts that they argue have spurred investment. Yet, this narrative conveniently omits the realities faced by ordinary Americans who are struggling to find homes within their financial reach.

Kroger Grocery Store
Kroger Grocery Store. Photo: JBTHEMILKER via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Selective Memory in Action

Both parties have a tendency to engage in selective memory when discussing housing starts. Democrats often highlight the importance of government intervention in stabilizing markets, but they conveniently forget the housing bubble that was fueled by overly lenient lending standards and government-sponsored enterprises that led to the 2008 financial crisis. Conversely, Republicans focus on the need for less regulation to unleash the market's potential but tend to overlook the consequences of unregulated speculative investments that can lead to instability.

X post from @WhiteHouse
X thread screenshot · frame 2/3 @WhiteHouse - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.
"The reality is that both sides have contributed to the mess we find ourselves in today."

As the housing market fluctuates, it becomes increasingly clear that both sides of the aisle have a vested interest in shaping the narrative to suit their agendas. Politicians, pundits, and party loyalists alike often present a skewed version of events that allows them to bask in the glow of perceived success while deflecting responsibility for failures.

The Affordability Crisis

Despite the positive headlines surrounding housing starts, the affordability crisis looms large. Many new constructions are luxury apartments or high-end homes that cater to wealthier buyers, leaving first-time homebuyers and low-income families in the lurch. The average price of a new home continues to rise, making it increasingly difficult for many Americans to realize the dream of homeownership.

X post from @cspan
X thread screenshot · frame 3/3 @cspan - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

For Democrats, the response has often been to push for increased funding for affordable housing initiatives. However, the execution of these initiatives can be slow and mired in bureaucracy, causing frustration among those who need assistance the most. On the other hand, Republicans frequently advocate for tax incentives to stimulate construction, yet they often fail to address the need for targeted support for low- and middle-income families.


A Call for Real Solutions

What is missing from the conversation is a recognition that both parties must work together to find real solutions to the housing crisis. The bipartisan habit of selective memory must be set aside in favor of a more honest dialogue about the failures and successes of past policies. Policymakers must confront the reality that housing is not just a commodity but a fundamental human need.

"Real solutions require a willingness to cooperate and acknowledge past mistakes."

As we move forward, it is essential that both sides acknowledge their roles in shaping the current landscape and work collaboratively to address the multifaceted challenges that lie ahead. Without this cooperation, the housing market may continue to be a battleground for political posturing rather than a space for genuine progress that benefits all Americans.

✦ ✦ ✦