November 2020 · National edition

Science

On Satellite Failure, and incentives on both sides of the aisle

A Science desk reading of satellite failure, filed 2020-11.

From the file. Written for the paper dated November 2020. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In the wake of the recent satellite failure that has captured headlines, it is essential to scrutinize the incentives that drive both political parties in addressing the vulnerabilities of our space infrastructure.

ISS-65 NASA astronauts work in the U.S. Destiny laboratory module
ISS-65 NASA astronauts work in the U.S. Destiny laboratory module. Photo: NASA

The Failure and Its Implications

On November 1, 2020, a significant satellite failure disrupted communications for thousands across the nation. The satellite, launched to provide critical services including weather data and emergency communication, fell silent without warning. Investigations are ongoing, but initial reports indicate a possible technical malfunction exacerbated by budget cuts and lack of oversight.

X post from @CommerceGov
X thread screenshot · frame 1/3 @CommerceGov - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

This incident underscores the importance of a robust satellite infrastructure. As our reliance on technology grows, so too does the need for reliable systems in space. Yet, the political response to such failures reveals deep-seated issues within both parties, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to funding and oversight.

Stars over the Mayall 4-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson, AZ.
Stars over the Mayall 4-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson, AZ. Photo: KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/P. Marenfeld via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

Incentives on the Right

On the right, there is a clear trend towards privatization and deregulation. The argument posits that the private sector can innovate faster than government can manage. While this might hold some merit, the reality is that without adequate oversight, the drive for profit can lead to cutting corners, resulting in catastrophic failures like the one we are currently witnessing.

X post from @CommerceGov
X thread screenshot · frame 2/3 @CommerceGov - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

The push for privatization often neglects the essential role that public funding plays in foundational research and development. In an eagerness to defer to market solutions, the right risks undermining the very systems that keep our satellite infrastructure operational. The recent satellite failure serves as a reminder that profit-driven motives must be balanced with a commitment to public safety and accountability.

“A focus solely on privatization may lead to gaps in essential services, undermining the very innovation it seeks to promote.”

Incentives on the Left

The left, on the other hand, often leans heavily on increased funding and government intervention as the ultimate solution. While advocating for more resources to be allocated for satellite programs, there is a tendency to overlook the importance of efficiency and accountability. Increased funding without oversight can result in waste and inefficiency, leading to the same failures that they seek to prevent.

X post from @BLS_gov
X thread screenshot · frame 3/3 @BLS_gov - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

Moreover, the left’s inclination toward regulation can stifle innovation. While regulations are necessary to ensure safety, an overly cautious approach can prevent the agile responses that the rapidly evolving tech landscape demands. The current satellite failure serves as a reminder that a balanced approach is necessary - one that encourages innovation while also holding companies accountable for their failures.


The Need for Bipartisan Cooperation

As we analyze the satellite failure, it becomes clear that neither the right nor the left holds the singular solution to our satellite infrastructure woes. A bipartisan approach is essential, one that fosters innovation while ensuring accountability.

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle must come together to create a framework that encourages investment in satellite technologies while implementing strict oversight. This would not only protect against future failures but also enhance the resilience of our space infrastructure against unforeseen challenges.

Conclusion

In this moment of crisis, we must push for a re-evaluation of our priorities concerning satellite infrastructure. The lessons learned from this failure should serve as a catalyst for change, prompting both sides of the political spectrum to recognize that unchecked extremes lead to vulnerabilities.

As we move forward, it is imperative that we advocate for a middle ground - one that embraces the strengths of both privatization and government oversight. Only by working together can we ensure that our satellite systems remain reliable and resilient, ultimately safeguarding our communications and data for generations to come.

✦ ✦ ✦