June 2020 · National edition

The Nation

Judiciary Vacancy After the Headlines Fade

A The Nation desk reading of judiciary vacancy, filed 2020-06.

From the file. Written for the paper dated June 2020. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As headlines fade and public attention shifts, the critical issue of judicial vacancies continues to linger in the background, revealing a quiet failure of oversight from both sides of the political spectrum.

President Joe Biden meets with Columbian President Iván Duque Márquez, Thursday, March 10, 2022, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz
President Joe Biden meets with Columbian President Iván Duque Márquez, Thursday, March 10, 2022, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz). Photo: The White House

Judicial Vacancies: A Crisis of Governance

As the nation grapples with unprecedented challenges, the judicial system remains in a precarious state. With numerous vacancies on the federal bench, the consequences of inaction are becoming increasingly apparent. The judicial branch, often seen as a bastion of impartiality, is now hampered by a lack of appointments, leaving critical cases unresolved and citizens without timely access to justice.

X post from @USGS
X thread screenshot · frame 1/3 @USGS - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

In recent months, the focus of political discourse has shifted dramatically, with the pandemic and social unrest overshadowing other pressing issues. Yet, the long-standing vacancies in the judiciary should not be overlooked. Both parties have a role in this systemic failure; the left's calls for sweeping reforms have often been met with resistance, while the right has focused on stacking the courts rather than addressing the backlog of vacancies.

Today is Primary Day in Alabama! Have you voted? Polls are open until 7pm -
Today is Primary Day in Alabama! Have you voted? Polls are open until 7pm -. Photo: United States Congress, Office of Terri Sewell via Wikimedia Commons
“Judicial appointments should not be a political chess game; they are essential to maintaining the rule of law.”

The Political Tug-of-War

The current administration has seized the opportunity to nominate judges who align with its ideological goals. While the intention to shape the judiciary is not new, the aggressive push for conservative appointments raises questions about the balance of power and the implications for future rulings. Critics argue that this strategy undermines judicial independence, turning courts into extensions of political agendas.

X post from @USGS
X thread screenshot · frame 2/3 @USGS - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

On the other hand, the left has responded with passionate rhetoric about the need for diversity and reform within the judiciary. However, their focus often becomes entangled in broader ideological battles rather than seeking practical solutions to the vacancies themselves. The result is a stalemate, where the pressing need for appointments is overshadowed by partisan bickering.

Consequences of Inaction

The implications of judicial vacancies extend beyond political posturing. Delays in appointing judges can lead to prolonged legal battles, affecting not only individuals seeking justice but also broader societal issues. Cases involving civil rights, healthcare, and criminal justice reform are at risk of stagnation, with citizens left in limbo as they await resolution.

X post from @NASAhistory
X thread screenshot · frame 3/3 @NASAhistory - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

This situation is particularly alarming in light of the ongoing public health crisis and the nationwide protests calling for racial justice. As courts grapple with essential cases that could shape the future of these movements, the lack of judicial resources could hinder progress and accountability.

“Access to justice should not be contingent on the political whims of those in power.”

A Call for Accountability

Both sides of the aisle must recognize their responsibility to ensure a functioning judiciary. The political gamesmanship surrounding judicial nominations must give way to a more constructive dialogue focused on the needs of the courts and the people they serve. It is time for leaders to prioritize the appointment of judges who reflect the diverse fabric of the nation and are committed to upholding the rule of law.

Moreover, the public must remain vigilant and demand accountability from their elected officials. The judiciary is a cornerstone of democracy, and its health is indicative of the overall state of governance. As citizens, we must advocate for timely appointments and support initiatives that seek to enhance the capacity of our courts to handle the pressing legal issues of our time.


Conclusion: Bridging the Divide

The current landscape of judicial vacancies serves as a stark reminder of the failures of oversight and accountability within our political system. It is not enough for either side to engage in blame games; real progress will require collaboration and a commitment to the ideals of justice and fairness. As the headlines fade, let us not forget the importance of a fully functioning judiciary and the responsibility we all share in ensuring its vitality.

✦ ✦ ✦