February 2020 · National edition

Commerce

Energy Grid After the Headlines Fade

A Commerce desk reading of energy grid, filed 2020-02.

From the file. Written for the paper dated February 2020. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As the fervor over climate change continues to dominate public discourse, the conversation surrounding our energy grid often fades into the background, overlooked in favor of more sensational narratives. In this piece, we take a closer look at the infrastructure that powers our daily lives and the ideological battles that threaten to overshadow the evidence.

Exterior of the AC (Alaska Commercial) store building in McGrath, Alaska.
Exterior of the AC (Alaska Commercial) store building in McGrath, Alaska. Photo: Dialh via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Energy Infrastructure: A Critical Assessment

The energy grid in the United States is not merely a network of wires and poles; it is the lifeblood of our economy and a cornerstone of our modern existence. Yet, as various factions on both the left and right engage in a war of words over energy policy, the facts about our grid are often lost in the shuffle. On one side, the progressive push for renewable energy sources like wind and solar is met with resistance from conservative voices who often cling to fossil fuels, insisting that they're the only reliable option for energy security.

X post from @USGS
X thread screenshot · frame 1/3 @USGS - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

Both extremes, however, risk losing sight of the evidence that should guide our energy policy. The reality is that transitioning to a more sustainable energy grid is not only necessary to combat climate change but also beneficial for economic growth and job creation. A recent report from a leading energy think tank suggests that a diversified energy portfolio - one that includes renewables alongside traditional sources - could provide the stability our grid desperately needs.

Kroger Grocery Store
Kroger Grocery Store. Photo: JBTHEMILKER via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Role of Evidence in Energy Policy

When discussing the future of our energy grid, it is essential to rely on data rather than ideology. For example, critics of renewable energy frequently cite the intermittency of solar and wind power as a reason to maintain dependence on fossil fuels. While it is true that these renewable sources can be unpredictable, advancements in battery storage technology and grid management have made it increasingly feasible to integrate renewables into our energy mix. In fact, many regions are already achieving impressive results by balancing the grid with a combination of renewables, traditional energy sources, and innovative storage solutions.

X post from @USGS
X thread screenshot · frame 2/3 @USGS - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.
"The future of our energy grid must be built on facts, not fear."

Conversely, some proponents of renewables often dismiss the importance of maintaining some level of fossil fuel infrastructure, arguing that a complete transition is both possible and necessary. While the urgency to address climate change is paramount, a balanced approach that recognizes the current realities of our energy landscape is critical. The truth is that a hasty transition might lead to energy shortages and economic repercussions that could undermine the very goals advocates aim to achieve.

Political Polarization and its Impact

The current political climate exacerbates the challenges facing our energy grid. The left’s aggressive push for a Green New Deal, while admirable in its ambition, often comes with proposals that could alienate moderate constituents. Meanwhile, the right’s staunch defense of fossil fuels can sometimes lead to the dismissal of legitimate research and evidence pointing toward the benefits of renewable energy. Both extremes risk creating a divisive narrative that hinders productive dialogue, making it more difficult to find common ground.

X post from @NASAhistory
X thread screenshot · frame 3/3 @NASAhistory - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

As politicians and activists continue to stake their claims, the evidence must prevail. It is time to move beyond identity politics and focus on pragmatic solutions that prioritize not just the environment but also economic stability and energy security. A collaborative approach, one that includes voices from both sides of the aisle, can lead to innovative policies that encourage investment in clean energy technology while also ensuring that the grid remains resilient.

A Call for Pragmatic Solutions

Several states have already begun to implement successful energy policies that balance the need for sustainability with the realities of energy demand. California, for instance, has made significant strides in integrating renewable energy while maintaining a reliable grid. By investing in infrastructure improvements and fostering public-private partnerships, the state is setting a precedent for others to follow.

To ensure that our energy grid is both sustainable and resilient, we must embrace a multifaceted approach that incorporates evidence-based policy making. This means engaging with scientists, economists, and energy experts across the spectrum, rather than allowing ideology to dictate our energy future. By prioritizing the facts, we can build an energy grid that meets the needs of the present while preparing for a sustainable future.


The Way Forward

In conclusion, the future of our energy grid should not be a battleground for ideological warfare. Instead, it should be a collaborative effort fueled by evidence and a shared commitment to progress. By recognizing the importance of both renewable and traditional energy sources, we can forge a path toward a more resilient and sustainable grid that stands the test of time.

✦ ✦ ✦