April 2011 · National edition

The Nation

On Line Item Politics, and the bipartisan habit of selective memory

A The Nation desk reading of line item politics, filed 2011-04.

From the file. Written for the paper dated April 2011. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

In the ever-shifting landscape of American politics, line item politics has emerged as a battleground where both left and right strategists engage in a curious dance of selective memory. It is a practice that reveals the frailty of political conviction and the convenience of partisan narratives.

United States Capitol shot through fence at sunrise.
United States Capitol shot through fence at sunrise. Photo: Crglenn via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Selective Memory in Action

Both sides of the aisle have cultivated a penchant for selectively recalling their legislative histories when it suits their current agendas. Republicans, for example, often bask in the glow of fiscal conservatism while simultaneously championing spending bills that contradict their stated principles. This inconsistency is not merely a product of human fallibility; it is a deliberate tactic that caters to the electorate's short attention span.

X post from @federalreserve
X thread screenshot · frame 1/3 @federalreserve - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

On the flip side, Democrats frequently invoke the moral high ground in debates, brandishing the banner of social justice while at times overlooking their own lapses in governance. The ability to cherry-pick past achievements - while glossing over failures - has become a hallmark of contemporary political discourse. Each party's selective memory serves as a means to rally supporters and vilify opponents, often at the expense of substantive discussion.

Adams County Government Center in Brighton, Colorado
Adams County Government Center in Brighton, Colorado. Photo: Bdearthco via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Case of the Budget

The recent budget negotiations serve as a case study in line item politics and selective memory. As Congress wrestles with fiscal responsibility, both parties are quick to point fingers. Republicans target social programs, framing them as bloated and wasteful, while Democrats retaliate by highlighting corporate tax breaks and military spending as examples of misplaced priorities.

X post from @federalreserve
X thread screenshot · frame 2/3 @federalreserve - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.
"In the end, it is the American public that pays the price for this political theater."

This back-and-forth underscores a larger issue: the unwillingness of either side to confront the full reality of the federal budget. Both parties have made choices that reflect a preference for political expediency over genuine fiscal responsibility. The result is a disjointed narrative that leaves voters confused and frustrated.

The Role of the Media

In this environment, the media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception. Coverage often mirrors the selective narratives pushed by both parties, reinforcing the tendency to focus on sensational headlines rather than in-depth analysis. The soundbite culture thrives in this landscape, where complex policy discussions are distilled into easily digestible snippets that cater to partisan audiences.

X post from @federalreserve
X thread screenshot · frame 3/3 @federalreserve - open original. Thread screenshots sit in the story so the record can be read without leaving the page.

Moreover, the media's own selective memory can skew the narrative. Coverage of past administrations tends to highlight partisan failures while glossing over bipartisan achievements, leading to a skewed understanding of the political landscape. This selective remembrance perpetuates the notion that political divisions are more entrenched than they may actually be.

Consequences of Line Item Politics

The consequences of this bipartisan habit are significant. Policy discussions become less about crafting effective governance and more about scoring political points. The public, caught in the crossfire, grows increasingly cynical about the motives of their elected officials. As trust in government wanes, the cycle of selective memory continues, further entrenching partisan divides.

A Call for Accountability

To break free from this cycle, both parties must embrace a greater sense of accountability. Acknowledging past missteps and engaging in honest dialogue about current challenges can help restore faith in the political process. It is essential for legislators to move beyond partisan posturing and work collaboratively toward solutions that benefit the American people.

The road ahead will not be easy. It requires courage, humility, and a commitment to transparency. However, if both sides can overcome their selective memories, they may find that there is more common ground than they realize. In a divided nation, the ability to engage in meaningful conversations about policy - rather than merely scoring political points - will be critical for the future of American democracy.


✦ ✦ ✦