November 2008 · National edition

The Nation

On Campaign Finance, and the bipartisan habit of selective memory

A The Nation desk reading of campaign finance, filed 2008-11.

From the file. Written for the paper dated November 2008. Opened in the public stacks July 14, 2026.

As the dust settles on a divisive election season, the conversation surrounding campaign finance remains as contentious as ever. Both sides of the political spectrum have shown a remarkable ability to forget their own past transgressions in favor of attacking the other.

President George W. Bush Is Backstage at the Black Tie and Boots Inaugural Ball with Jenna and Barbara Bush, Mrs.
President George W. Bush Is Backstage at the Black Tie and Boots Inaugural Ball with Jenna and Barbara Bush, Mrs. Photo: The White House

The Bipartisan Blind Spot

In the wake of the recent election, the topic of campaign finance has been thrust into the spotlight. With an incoming administration poised to make sweeping changes, one would hope for a constructive debate on how to reform a system rife with loopholes and undue influence. Instead, we are witnessing a familiar pattern: both Democrats and Republicans have engaged in a selective memory regarding their own roles in the evolution of campaign finance.

For years, Democrats have decried the influence of big money in politics, particularly following the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Citizens United v. FEC. This ruling has given corporations and unions unprecedented freedom to spend money on political campaigns, and the left has seized upon this moment to rally their base around the issue. Yet, it is worth noting that the Democratic Party has not always been the bastion of campaign finance reform it now claims to be. In fact, the party has historically benefited from significant contributions from special interest groups, particularly during the Clinton years, when fundraising from Wall Street hit new heights.

Rep. Stan Jordan, R-Jacksonville, comments at a news conference in the Capitol rotunda Thursday, March 16, 2006, in Tallahassee, Florida
Rep. Stan Jordan, R-Jacksonville, comments at a news conference in the Capitol rotunda Thursday, March 16, 2006, in Tallahassee, Florida. Photo: JH via Wikimedia Commons (CC0)

On the flip side, Republicans have long touted their commitment to reducing the influence of money in politics, framing themselves as the champions of grassroots movements. However, the party's rhetoric often belies its actions. The GOP has been adept at courting wealthy donors and corporate money, especially during the Bush administration, which saw record levels of campaign contributions from the business sector. This hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed, as many voters are left wondering how genuine the Republican commitment to reform really is.

The Cycle of Blame

The cycle of blame between the two parties has fostered an environment where meaningful reform seems increasingly unlikely. Each party is quick to point fingers at the other while ignoring its own complicity in the current state of affairs. This blame game not only distracts from the pressing need for reform but also perpetuates a culture of cynicism among voters who feel disillusioned by a system that seems rigged against them.

“The blame game distracts from the pressing need for reform and perpetuates a culture of cynicism among voters.”

Moreover, this selective memory extends beyond campaign contributions. Both parties have historically supported legislation that favors their donors. The McCain-Feingold Act, for instance, aimed at curbing the influence of soft money in politics, was initially championed by Democrats but later faced criticism from both sides for its perceived shortcomings. The act was a product of a bipartisan compromise, yet it has not succeeded in addressing the fundamental issues that plague campaign finance.

What is at Stake?

As we move forward, it is vital for both parties to acknowledge the complexities of campaign finance reform. Voters deserve transparency and accountability from those who seek to represent them. The influence of money in politics is not just a partisan issue; it affects the very fabric of democracy. If we continue down this path of selective memory and partisan finger-pointing, we risk further alienating the electorate and undermining the democratic process.

With the new administration on the horizon, there is a unique opportunity for bipartisan collaboration on campaign finance reform. Leaders from both parties must put aside their differences and work towards solutions that prioritize the interests of the American people over those of wealthy donors and special interest groups. This will require not only a commitment to reform but also a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about their own histories.

A Call to Action

As citizens, it is our responsibility to hold our elected officials accountable. We must demand that they prioritize campaign finance reform and take concrete steps towards a more equitable political system. This means not only advocating for stricter regulations on campaign contributions but also pushing for greater transparency in how money influences policy decisions.

In the end, the future of our democracy depends on our ability to confront the realities of campaign finance and work together to forge a path forward. It is time for both Democrats and Republicans to stop the blame game and start taking responsibility for their roles in shaping a system that truly serves the interests of all Americans.


✦ ✦ ✦